01 / Medical & scientific writing

A document built around your evidence.

Research manuscripts, reviews, case reports and abstracts. We help develop the structure, organise the source material and present the findings for the intended audience.

Explore medical writing ↗

Medical & scientific writing

Source material review01
Outline development02
Drafting and author queries03
Reference checks04

02 / Manuscript & academic editing

Make the argument easier to follow.

Language, structure and consistency editing for manuscripts and academic documents. We flag unclear claims and reporting gaps for author review.

Explore editing ↗

Manuscript & academic editing

Structural editing01
Language refinement02
Terminology checks03
Journal style04

03 / Systematic reviews & meta-analysis

Support at a defined stage of the review.

Planning, data extraction, synthesis and reporting support, scoped around your question, available data and completed work.

Explore evidence synthesis ↗

Systematic reviews & meta-analysis

Protocol development support01
Extraction frameworks02
Analysis support03
Reporting checks04

04 / Clinical & regulatory document support

Clear documents for clinical project teams.

Editorial and source-based support for clinical and regulatory documents, including clarity, cross-document consistency, terminology and reference verification. Protocol and study-report assignments are assessed individually against the brief and available expertise.

Discuss the document ↗

Clinical & regulatory document support

Document editing01
Literature summaries02
Consistency review03
Reference and table checks04

Scope and suitability are confirmed before work starts. Sponsor and regulatory experts retain responsibility for strategy, compliance and submission. Swedish-language documents require appropriately qualified language review.

05 / Healthcare & medical affairs content

The right depth for the reader.

Evidence-based healthcare articles, educational resources, scientific slide decks, literature summaries and meeting reports for an agreed audience.

Discuss healthcare content ↗

Healthcare & medical affairs content

Healthcare web content01
Education materials02
Scientific decks03
Evidence summaries04

06 / Research communication & funding

Help readers see the purpose of the work.

Editing for grant applications, research narratives, impact statements, posters and conference presentations. We also develop English plain-language summaries from agreed source material.

Discuss research communication ↗

Research communication & funding

Grant editing01
Research summaries02
Posters and figures03
Plain-language content04

07 / Freelance agency support

Extra writing capacity for your next brief.

Flexible support for medical communications and content agencies, with agreed deliverables, review rounds and handover arrangements.

Explore agency support ↗

Freelance agency support

Project assignments01
Recurring support02
Editorial review03
Reference management04

08 / Academic editing & research guidance

Support that keeps the author in charge.

Editing, feedback and research guidance within your institution’s requirements. We help authors refine their own argument, reporting and presentation.

Discuss academic support ↗

Academic editing & research guidance

Draft feedback01
Reporting guidance02
Reference organisation03
Document formatting04

Rejected manuscript? Start here.

A rejection letter.
A plan for the
next submission.

We turn editorial decisions and reviewer comments into a practical revision plan, then help you address the manuscript’s underlying problems.

Discuss a rejected manuscript ↗
Fictional reviewer comment

“The conclusions imply causation, but the study is cross-sectional.”

Changing a few words is only part of the task. The interpretation, abstract and discussion must tell the same story.

Illustrative example only. No client manuscript, reviewer text or study result is reproduced.

01 / Our approach

Check the design and analysis against the claims. Replace causal language, explain the temporal limitation and reconcile the abstract with the discussion.

02 / Revised text

“Higher symptom scores were associated with lower reported quality of life. The cross-sectional design prevents conclusions about the direction of this association.”

03 / Response to the reviewer

“We agree that the design does not support causal inference. We have revised the abstract and discussion to describe associations and added the temporal limitation to the discussion.”

01

Assess

Read the decision, assess journal fit and identify the concerns that require author input.

02

Map

Turn each comment into an action, query or reasoned response.

03

Revise

Address structure, reporting and interpretation alongside language.

04

Respond

Connect each response with the relevant manuscript change.

05

Check

Reconcile the clean draft, tracked changes and submission documents.

New analyses or additional data are scoped separately. Authors approve scientific decisions and the final submission. Journals make acceptance decisions.

Editorial workflow support

Make each review
easier to manage.

Document templates, reference libraries and revision trackers help your team keep decisions and document versions organised.

Agree the scope before work starts.

Fees reflect the document, its condition, the depth of support and the deadline. Analysis and new literature searches are scoped separately. We agree revision arrangements in the quotation.

Request a tailored quotation ↗

Bring us your brief.

A first draft, a reviewer decision or a defined assignment.

Start a conversation ↗