Support at your review’s current stage.

We first establish what you have completed and what remains to be verified. A new review may need planning support; an existing review may need extraction checks, analysis or clearer reporting.

Possible assignments include protocol development, eligibility criteria, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment and statistical synthesis. The review question and available evidence determine the methods.

Analysis that fits the evidence

Before pooling results, we examine study characteristics, outcome definitions and the data available for the proposed comparison. The scope may include sensitivity analyses, tables, figures and analysis files.

We document methodological decisions and flag data or reporting gaps for author review. Reporting support can address the manuscript and relevant review checklists.

Define the assignment before starting

Tell us the review topic, protocol status, searches completed, number of potentially eligible studies and outcomes of interest. Include your deadline and required outputs.

New searches, screening, duplicate assessment and statistical work require a stated scope and agreed responsibilities. We will identify the materials needed before confirming the fee and timing.